There has long been a misperception about the West Philippine Sea (WPS), which is part of the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Many people wrongly refer to it as part of the South China Sea. However, a watershed moment happened in 2016, when the Hague Court conclusively affirmed that the West Philippine Sea is part of Philippine territory, undermining China’s claimed nine-dash line. This landmark judicial decision not only confirmed the Philippines’ sovereign rights in the region, but also paved the way for legislative initiatives like House Bill 7819, which seek to clarify and strengthen the country’s maritime sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea.
The current state of Philippines-China relations is significantly influenced by territorial disputes in WPS. Tensions escalated notably after a naval standoff over Scarborough Shoal started in April 2012, and the situation has since intensified due to apprehensions surrounding China’s unauthorized occupation, unapproved construction of infrastructures, and instances of intrusions and encroachments within the EEZ of the Philippines.
These developments underscore the intricate challenges in diplomatic relations, posing profound implications for sovereignty and maritime security. As the West Philippine Sea continues to be a focal point of regional and international attention, the Philippine Maritime Zones Act emerges as a legislative cornerstone, serving as a guide for the nation’s maritime governance and resource management.
What is House Bill 7819?
Crafted to provide a comprehensive framework for delineating the various maritime zones under the nation’s jurisdiction, a significant stride toward defining and safeguarding its maritime boundaries, the Philippines has taken a noteworthy step with the introduction of House Bill 7819, commonly known as the Philippine Maritime Zones Act.
HB 7819 categorizes the nation’s maritime zones as internal waters, archipelagic waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone, EEZ, and continental shelf. The proposed legislation also contains a stipulation permitting foreign vessels and aircraft from states adhering to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and international laws to fully enjoy navigational and other rights within Philippine maritime zones.
Key Provisions
As outlined in the explanatory note of the bill, the primary aim of the Maritime Zones legislation is to officially delineate the maritime zones of the Philippines in accordance with the standards established by UNCLOS. The bill seeks to bring clarity to the geographical extent of the Philippine maritime domain while concurrently elucidating the legal powers that the Philippines possesses and may exercise over these designated zones.
Beyond the technicalities of nautical miles and jurisdictional limits, the implications of HB 7819 extend to national security, economic development, and the assertion of sovereign rights in the contested waters. With its potential to shape the country’s maritime policies for years to come, this legislation prompts a closer examination of its provisions, significance, and the broader implications for the Philippines in navigating the complex waters of the West Philippine Sea.
In May 2023, Representative Rachel Arenas of Pangasinan, serving as the Chairperson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the sponsor of the bill, emphasized the imperative of aligning domestic laws on maritime territory with the 1982 UNCLOS.
“This bill harmonizes our domestic legislations with the international regime for the oceans, further clarifying the nature and status of the waters connecting the various islands of the Philippines and the adjacent seas of the archipelago,” Arenas said.
In asserting the need for a declaration of “what is ours,” Arenas argued that such a measure is essential for the defense and protection of the country’s maritime zones. She emphasized that a recognized delineation of maritime boundaries is crucial for strengthening the Philippines’ position in the West Philippine Sea and facilitating negotiations with neighboring nations.
Arenas stressed that without the acknowledgment of these boundaries by the international community, the Philippines cannot effectively secure its position or advocate for its interests. She underscored the significance of enacting a Maritime Zones Law as a pivotal step toward safeguarding the future of the Filipino people.
Significance of Declaring Maritime zones
The passage of HB 7819 heralds a pivotal moment in Philippine maritime governance, conferring exclusive rights upon the nation for the exploration and exploitation of resources within its delineated maritime zones.
This broad spectrum of exclusive rights aligns with the provisions of UNCLOS, underscoring the significance of international legal frameworks in shaping the country’s maritime policies. These exclusive rights affirm the Philippines’ commitment to asserting control over its maritime territories, solidifying its position as a key player in the regional geopolitical landscape.
In line with UNCLOS, which recognizes coastal states’ sovereign rights over their EEZ and continental shelf, the Philippine government now possesses the legal backing to regulate and harness the resources found within these zones. The exclusivity granted by HB 7819 not only bolsters the Philippines’ economic potential but also fortifies its environmental stewardship responsibilities in these ecologically sensitive areas. The legislation’s emphasis on adherence to international laws, particularly UNCLOS, not only ensures legal clarity but also positions the Philippines as a responsible custodian of its marine resources on the global stage.
As the Philippines secures exclusive rights under HB 7819, these provisions play a crucial role in diplomatic dialogues amid ongoing territorial disputes. The legislation forms the foundation for asserting sovereignty in negotiations with neighboring nations, emphasizing the commitment to international norms. In the complex West Philippine Sea, these exclusive rights are central to the nation’s maritime strategy, fostering both economic growth and diplomatic stability.
In an August 2022 interview, security analyst and Chinese studies expert Rommel Banlaoi emphasized the urgency of passing a maritime zone law. He stated, “It is an urgent task for us, to pass a maritime zone law so that we will be able to have a domestic legislation identifying our maritime zones that will tell us the extent of our contiguous zone, our exclusive economic zone, and even our position on continental shelf where we can exercise our sovereign rights.”
In December 2023, Senator Francis Tolentino called for the passage of HB 7819, emphasizing that it represents a crucial step in addressing challenges in the maritime domain. According to Tolentino, the bill serves as a pivotal measure in clearly defining the geographical boundaries of the Philippines’ maritime zone. Additionally, he highlighted that the legislation would delineate the specific authority and jurisdiction that the country can assert and enforce in the maritime domain.
“In sum, the Maritime Zones Law will help the Philippines in numerous ways and can even serve as a foundational policy that serves as the driving force for the Philippines to forge a comprehensive maritime security framework; advances the Philippine interest, most especially in terms of protecting, sustainably harnessing, and maximizing the Philippines’ marine resources; provides guidance on the rights, duties, and entitlements of the Philippines on different maritime zones; and can be utilized to further the goals of other relevant maritime laws of the Philippines,” Tolentino said.
Exclusive Rights for Exploring and Exploiting Resources
As per the provisions of the legislation, the Philippines is endowed with sovereign control over its internal waters, hence, the grant of exclusive rights to the Philippines under HB 7819 marks a resolute leap in asserting the nation’s sovereignty amid the turbulent waters of the West Philippine Sea. The legislation endows the Philippines with unequivocal authority over internal waters, archipelagic waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone, EEZ, and continental shelf.
With recognized sovereignty over maritime zones, the Philippines gains effective control of resources within its EEZ in the WPS. This benefits Filipino fisherfolks by granting exclusive access to vital fisheries and marine resources, ensuring sustainable and responsible utilization for generations to come while preventing undue competition and exploitation.
For small Filipino communities situated on islands near the WPS, the exclusive rights translate into a sense of security and empowerment. The legislation enables the Philippines to regulate and manage resources within its maritime boundaries, mitigating the risk of external interference and ensuring the well-being of these communities. As the nation exercises its sovereign rights, it creates a conducive environment for local economies to thrive, fostering resilience and sustainability in the face of evolving geopolitical dynamics in the WPS.
Future Implications for the Philippines’ Maritime Jurisdiction
Implications for the Philippines’ maritime jurisdiction, shaped by legislative initiatives like HB 7819, are poised to redefine the nation’s standing on the international stage. With a clear delineation of maritime zones aligned with UNCLOS standards, the Philippines not only solidifies its territorial claims but also strengthens its position in diplomatic negotiations.
The legislation, by explicitly stating the country’s exclusive rights in exploring and exploiting resources, positions the Philippines as a responsible custodian of its maritime territories. This proactive stance not only holds economic promise, unlocking the potential of marine resources for sustainable development but also underscores the nation’s commitment to environmental stewardship in the face of global challenges such as climate change.
As the Philippines charts a course toward the future with a well-defined legal framework, the implications of such maritime legislation extend beyond legal intricacies. The nation’s exclusive rights over its maritime zones pave the way for strategic decision-making in matters of national security, resource management, and international cooperation.
Additionally, this clarity in jurisdiction empowers the Philippines to navigate complex geopolitical waters, fostering stability in the region and providing a foundation for collaborative efforts in addressing shared challenges. The future, shaped by these legislative strides, holds the promise of a Philippines that not only asserts its maritime sovereignty but also contributes to regional harmony and global discourse on responsible maritime governance.
How is this important to us Filipinos?
The significance of enacting a Maritime Zones Law, extends far beyond legal frameworks and territorial boundaries; it holds profound importance for Filipinos on multiple fronts. The legislation establishes a concrete foundation for the Philippines to safeguard its maritime territories, particularly in the West Philippine Sea.
As the bill seeks to precisely define the country’s maritime zones, it establishes a solid legal foundation that directly influences private sector interests. Clarity on maritime boundaries enhances the security of business operations for industries engaged in maritime activities, such as shipping, fisheries, and offshore exploration. The delineation provided by the legislation not only streamlines legal frameworks for private enterprises but also fosters an environment of certainty, encouraging investments and facilitating sustainable economic growth.
This is of paramount importance in a region marked by geopolitical tensions, territorial disputes, and competing claims. By clearly defining and declaring its maritime zones, the Philippines aims to fortify its sovereign rights, ensuring the protection of valuable resources and asserting its position in diplomatic negotiations.
By specifying sea lanes, air routes, and delineating natural resources within the EEZ, HB 7819 ensures that private enterprises engaged in these sectors have a clear understanding of the regulatory landscape. This legal clarity not only mitigates risks associated with ambiguous maritime boundaries but also empowers private entities with a defined scope for resource exploration and exploitation.
Furthermore, the enactment of such a law contributes to national security and aligns with economic interests, offering Filipinos the opportunity to harness the full potential of their maritime resources. Exclusive rights over living and nonliving resources within the delineated zones empower the nation to regulate and exploit these assets sustainably, contributing to economic growth, job creation, and overall prosperity.
How do we further advocate for the bill?
This legislation resonates with a sense of national pride and identity. It symbolizes the Philippines’ commitment to asserting itself as a responsible and sovereign maritime nation, capable of navigating the complexities of international relations with confidence and clarity. In this context, the enactment of a Maritime Zones Law becomes a collective endeavor for the Filipino people, safeguarding their interests, securing their future, and reinforcing their standing in the global community.
To propel the recognition of HB 7819 and reinforce its significance nationally and internationally, a strategic advocacy process comes into play. Firstly, employing strategic communication campaigns becomes imperative, where every Filipino can leverage both traditional and social media platforms to disseminate information about the bill’s merits, underscoring its alignment with international legal standards such as UNCLOS.
Secondly, collaborative initiatives with key influencers, legal experts, and environmental advocates can amplify the importance of the legislation in defining and defending the Philippines’ maritime boundaries. Seeking endorsements from respected organizations and personalities, along with leveraging diplomatic channels to highlight the bill’s merits, can reinforce its credibility.
Community-level initiatives, such as organizing informational sessions, town hall meetings, or online campaigns, can be effective tools to educate fellow citizens about the significance of the law. By fostering a deeper understanding of how HB 7819 protects the Philippines’ maritime zones and exclusive rights, ordinary citizens can contribute to a broader national conversation.
Tagging relevant government officials, influencers, and advocacy groups can also help in reaching a wider audience and creating momentum for the cause. Collaborating with local community leaders, non-governmental organizations, and advocacy groups aligned with the goals of HB 7819 can also amplify the collective voice
Lastly, utilizing the momentum generated by public awareness campaigns, stakeholders can articulate the economic, environmental, and security benefits associated with the legislation, appealing to a broad spectrum of interests. Through a multifaceted approach encompassing media outreach, diplomatic engagement, and public discourse, the advocacy for the recognition of HB 7819 can be elevated, ultimately contributing to the establishment of a well-defined and respected legal framework for the Philippines’ maritime zones.
Follow Us!
Stay informed and contribute to the cause by following Angkin PH on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. Your support matters in safeguarding our national heritage. Join the movement for a sovereign and sustainable future!
